New Year’s Resolution: Take 2

January 1, 2009

A new year is here and it’s time to once again reflect on the past year and see how close or far we’ve gotten with our resolutions of yesteryear.  For my part, I came pretty close to following all of mine.  The one resolution that I faltered on was being more health conscious.  In my podcast and on this blog, I have tried to learn and pass on information that correlates with the political-societal-economical paradigms that define the world around us.  Or at least a fraction of it as there are many points of view and I only have one of many of them.

Of course mental stimulation, when it comes to academic thought, is the least hard thing for me to do as I am a constant scholar on the studies of life.  I wholeheartedly enjoy learning new things on just about any topic.  It’s the nitty gritty hard-labor of the body that I am deeply flawed in.  Because of this, I am once again putting health consciousness and fitness on my resolution agenda for 2009 and limiting it to just that.  I will of course continue learning new things as I love to seek out knowledge and to continue to mentally grow as a person.  But now is the time for me to really take physical fitness seriously.

At the age of 31, I’m not getting any younger, and of course I’m only going to be more susceptible to aches and illnesses if I continue on with my bad eating habits at my age.  Plus it just makes sense that if you live a more sedentary life, your body won’t be as agile or flexible as it used to be when you were younger and more physically active.  So here’s to being more healthy for 2009.  I’ll let you know how that goes come 2010.


Don’t let your right to vote be taken from you

October 10, 2008

I was listening to yesterday’s podcast episode of Democracy Now! when a particular news segment began to infuriate me.  They were talking about how the voting system is being rigged by both the Democrats and the Republicans to suit their needs.  I found this very appalling and felt this story should reach the masses.  I’m doing my part by mass emailing people the link to this story and posting it on twit and on the forums that I linger on.  I will also be discussing this on an upcoming podcast episode of my how and of course post the link here as well.  There is no reason people should be in the dark on this story.  Everyone should have their right to vote and not have their voice suppressed by some hucksters in the political machine.

Click on this link to the Democracy Now! news story and audio download


Drunk American Woman talk politics.

September 28, 2008

It’s crazy that there are people this ignorant on today’s politics. Makes you really wonder what’s going to happen come Election Day


At Long Last, Episode 10 Is Up

September 8, 2008

Sorry for the delay but you know how life can get.  I’ll try to be more diligent in the upcoming Guatemalan-themed episode.  Until then, please accept that I’m just human :)

Click on this link to go straight to the audio feed

Click on this link to go to the shownotes and download file


Episode 9 is finally up and running

September 1, 2008

Due to the craziness of this past week, with new audio equipment arriving and visits to the city, episode 9 posted a day later than expected.  But at least it’s finally up and running so enjoy.

Click here to straight to the audio feed

Click here to go to show notes and download link


Cool Mash-up video about Obama’s Nomination

June 16, 2008

I just came across this on the Ill Doctrine Blog and I thought I’d share this. I’m definitely inspired.


Two days have passed but the Democrat’s delegate count continues to confound

February 7, 2008

With the exception of MSNBC (which still shows Obama up 838 to Clinton’s 834), it seems that the other websites now have new delegate counts. The NY Times originally showed the Associated Press’ delegate count on their homepage and their own delegate count. Now, the Associated Press’ numbers are nowhere to be found and their own count has spiked. Yesterday, they had Obama beating Clinton 34 to 21. Today, however, Clinton is now winning, with two sets of numbers. Her Feb. 5th numbers are up 667 to Obama’s 583 but now, it seems, they’re also using Super Delegates which balloons her lead to 892 over 716.

CNN originally had Clinton up 818 to 730 but now that has changed to 823 over 741. In case you weren’t confused enough, here are some other sites I forgot to mention before. Yahoo’s political dashboard shows Clinton at 830 delegates and Obama at 820. Fox News shows Clinton ahead 1,024 to Obama’s 933. Finally, Real Clear Politics, shows Clinton in the lead 1,060 to 981. I’m sure there are more numbers out there, but I don’t have the energy or the patience to delve into more baffling results.

So why is there still discrepancy to the delegate counts? Well, according to MSNBC, “Different news organizations make different delegate calls at different points along the process” and “some estimate what the candidates will get after the lengthy counting process has played itself out.”

However, the NY Times claim they use officially pledged numbers. If this is the case, how are their numbers higher than MSNBC, CNN and Yahoo? It made more sense yesterday when their numbers were drastically smaller. It doesn’t make sense that the other sites would keep official counts out of their estimated totals.

What is the lesson to all this? For me, it’s to vote for the person that best represents your cause and just be patient until the official candidate is delared at their respective Conventions.


Super Tuesday and Delegates and Super Delegates, oh my!

February 6, 2008

So I’ve been trying my best to follow the political races and I’m getting confused beyond all reason. According to MSNBC, Obama has 838 delegates to Clinton’s 834. However when I jump over to CNN, Clinton is up with 818 while Obama is down with 730. The Associated Press (found on the homepage of NY Times website) shows that Clinton is leading Obama in the delegate count 1,000 to 902; whereas, the NY Times’ actual count is showing Obama winning 34 to Clinton’s 21. Now why are the NY Times numbers so drastically smaller than everyone else’s you might ask? Well the reason is that, “the New YorkTimes counts only delegates that have been officially selected and are bound by their preferences.”

So what does this all mean? Heck if I know. The only constant, no matter the numbers, is that the Democratic race is a close one. Now the Republican side is a different story. There are some discrepancies with the numbers for the Republican on the websites I mentioned above as well; however, they all show McCain with a large majority. This doesn’t hold true for the Democrats because some sites show Obama winning, others show Clinton in the lead.


A much needed rant about recent media bullet points

January 27, 2008

This past week has been a smorgasbord of punditry, media speculation and just plain “gossip” regarding the leading political candidates running through the 2008 primaries. Particularly, the news highlights regarding Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama. It has been very frustrating for me because the media and pundits have been making a lot of broad speculations regarding race and gender. Being a Hispanic semi-college-educated male, I found all of this speculation very offensive. Needless to say, I have a need to rant and so I apologize in advance for a very wordy blog entry this week. On my agenda are the following bullet points:

· Racial divisions: Blacks vs. Hispanics

· Hillary Cinton: Gender roles and race in politics

· Voting based on personality

On to the first bullet point, the media has been making this huge deal about there being a huge racial divide in this country. Yes, it’s true that racism still exists. And yes, it’s also true that because of racism and other forms of prejudices in our society, there have also been a lot of injustices. I’m not totally naïve or blind to these paradoxes. However, despite these guffaws in the fabric of American life, we’ve had progress since 1968. There have been more inter-racial marriages and more interaction in general between different ethnicities over the years. So with this progress, it is also very ignorant to assume that there is still this enormous unwavering “racial” rift in the U.S.

Unfortunately, some of the generalities made in the media are not completely unfounded. Gregory Rodriguez, the author of Mongrels, Bastards, Orphans & Vagabonds: Mexican Immigration and the Future of Race In America, was interviewed in a recent show of NPR’s Talk of the Nation and acknowledged, that especially, in Los Angeles, CA, a lot of Hispanic communities are afraid of the idea of a Black man in power. When an investigative reporter from NPR asked a Hispanic in L.A. what he knew about Obama, he ignorantly said that he was nervous about a Muslim becoming President because of what was going on with us in the Middle-East. The reporter then informed him that Obama was in fact a Christian. This completely took the Hispanic by surprise and he was left speechless.

Having a background in urban sociology, I know a good amount of facts and statistics about how blacks are portrayed in the media. I won’t bother you readers with all this information at the moment, but needless to say, we are constantly bombarded with negative stereotypes of Blacks in America. The irony that most Hispanics don’t realize is that they too are constantly portrayed in a negative light. Hispanics are generally viewed as illegal immigrants from Mexico or Central America. I can’t tell you how many times people assume I am Mexican just because of my name. When I tell them I was born in the U.S. and am of Colombian descent, they feel foolish and marvel at how “educated” I am. How many minorities can relate to that? Go on, raise your hands. Don’t you all hear how the pundits marvel at how “well-spoken” Obama is?

Now let’s move on to Senator Clinton. The media has been portraying her as robotic and being unfairly compared to her rivals because of her gender. Some female pundits state that Hillary Clinton is called calculating and manipulative but that no one says the same thing about McCain or Guiliani or others. When she had a barely noticeable low-cut shirt on, the media pounded on her for “exploiting” her sexuality. They mockingly called this “Breast Gate”. When she won in New Hampshire, the media kept raging that she was able to get “her tribe” to unite under her. The sisterhood rallied against the male oppression of our society.

The media also suggests that she is unfairly judged because of the already established gender roles. If she talks too strongly, she is considered bitchy by “men”; however, if she shows emotion, it’s because she is a women and therefore weak. Women, on the other hand, “need” her to show emotion and at the same time be strong and rally on. If she acts unfazed by criticism women will then see her as too robotic and “feel” disconnected to her.

The fact is, Senator Clinton is calculating. I’m not saying this because she is a woman. I’m saying this because of her recent actions. In the SC debates, she implied that Obama worked for a slum lord. The week before that, she twisted Obama’s appraisal of Reagan, and accused him of favoring the Reagan era over Democratic ideals. When the DNC pulled out of Michigan because it broke party rules and moved its primary date, she kept her name on the ballot and is now fighting to make these votes count to try and win the candidacy.

Hillary Clinton keeps stating that she is not trying to bring gender into politics or her campaign but she keeps saying that she’s fighting against the “glass ceiling”. With this feminist statement, she contradicts herself by having Bill go out “on his own” to do all the dirty work for her. If the media calls her on this, she merely claims unaccountability for his actions.

Both Clintons keeps accusing the Obama camp of pushing race into the primaries; yet, when a reporter asked Bill Clinton about Obama’s claim, that he was being attacked by “Team Clinton”, Bill compares Barack Obama’s campaign to Jesse Jackson’s campaign in South Carolina in 1984 and 1988 instead of actually answering the question.

You may be asking yourself if I am an Obama supporter based on the previous few paragraphs, but I’m just reacting to the recent events in the media. I’m an equal injustice protester. My favorite candidates are, actually, very nearly out of the running and I’m questioning what my voting plans may be after Super Tuesday.

Now the sad fact is that a lot of Americans do treat the electoral process as a personality contest. Even though some of this is true in our society, we have to rise above these narrow-minded points of views. This year’s upcoming presidential election will be the most defining moment of U.S. history in our lives. We shouldn’t be voting on personality. We should look at the issues, compare the pros and cons of each candidate, and see which one best represents our ideals. This is not a popularity contest. Look what that mindset has given us this past 8 years.

The great thing that’s happening right now is that our society has grown over the years. People are more restless and frustrated with our current system than they have been in decades. Not everyone fits these convenient monikers that the media and pundits want to compartmentalize us in. And that is why these polls keep getting it wrong. People are becoming more involved and invested with the mechanism of our electoral process and they want to see results for a change. They no longer care for “business as usual” politics.


Another funny webvideo

January 20, 2008

Throughout the week I was getting ready to vent about Mike Huckabee and some of the things he said in Michigan about the Constitution; however, my knowledge of politics is limited and I didn’t want to sound like another ill-informed pundit. So instead, I kept trying to soothe my frustrations and pondered on other things to talk about, when I stumbled upon this Crunchgear article. Needless to say, this was the cure to my ails and I’m a happier and less stressed person for it. Hope you check them out and enjoy them as well. Until the next blog entry…